🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.